Skip to main content

Staten v. State

Citations

  • 232 S.W.2d 18
  • 191 Tenn. 157
  • 27 Beeler 157
  • 1950 Tenn. LEXIS 560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an appellate court’s “expressions on certain things . . . which are not necessary for a determination of the lawsuit” are “known as dictum” and are not controlling “when the question rises again”
  • noting that Tennessee Supreme Court does not “render advisory opinions on questions which are premature and contingent and may never arise in the future”
  • noting that Tennessee Supreme Court does not \render advisory opinions on questions which are premature and contingent and may never arise in the future\
  • providing that dicta is an expression by a court that is “not necessary for a determination of the lawsuit” and is “not binding as an authority or a precedent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.