Staten Island Rapid Transit Ry. Co. v. Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that, even under Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b)’s heightened pleading standard, a plaintiff need not plead specific transaction dates “when the alleged conduct spans a significant time period or involves numerous occurrences”
• declining to impose sanctions because the “misrepresentations” were “by and large, factual disputes between the parties”
• tortious interference claim based upon defendants’ “scheme to siphon money from plaintiff-company into other entities owned and operated by Defendants”
• no veil piercing/alter ego claims at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).