Skip to main content
· 2/28/2012

Statek Corp. V Development Specialists, Inc. (In Re Coudert Bros. Llp)

Citations

  • 673 F.3d 180
  • 2012 WL 615281
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4019
  • 56 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that N.Y. C.P.L.R. 202 ʺguards against forum shopping by out‐of‐state plaintiffs by mandating use of the shortest statute of limitations availableʺ
  • noting that while bankruptcy jurisdiction is a form of federal question jurisdiction, “Eñe made clear that state law provides the rules of decision for the merits of state law claims in bankruptcy court” (emphasis in original) (citations omitted)
  • instructing “bankruptcy court to apply the choice of law rules of Connecticut to decide Statek’s motion for reconsideration”
  • distinguishing Gaston and holding that bankruptcy courts should apply the choice of law rules for the state in which a prepetition complaint was filed under circumstances not present here
  • “[A] federal court sitting in diversity must generally apply the choice of law rules of the state in which it sits.”
  • “[A] federal court sitting in diversity must generally apply the choice of law rules of the state in which it sits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Calabresi, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.