State v. Zybach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence that after defendant had sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old girl, he had continued encounters with her in an effort to encourage her to have sex with him was admissible to show why she did not report the sexual assault until nine months after it occurred
• evidence offered to show why a victim delayed in reporting incidents of sexual abuse is relevant for a noncharacter purpose
• evidence offered to show why a victim delayed in reporting incidents of sexual abuse is relevant for a non- character purpose
• evidence of “the ongoing relationship” between the defendant and the victim was relevant to allow jury to “infer reasons for the delayed reporting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).