State v. Zucal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the complain- ant’s suit to quiet title was \essentially one in equity\ and concluding, therefore, that the district court \properly denied the demand for trial by jury\ under the Seventh Amendment
• applying New Mexico law to hold that a probate court’s decree of heirship and apportionment of the decedent’s property was open to a collateral attack on the ground that certain interested parties did not receive effective service of process
• applying New Mexico law to hold that a probate court’s decree of heirship and apportionment of the decedent’s property was open to a collateral attack on the ground that certain interested parties did not receive effective service of process
• applying New Mexico law to hold that a probate court’s decree of heirship 16 and apportionment of the decedent’s property was open to a collateral attack on the 17 ground that certain interested parties did not receive effective service of process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named State v. Zucal

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• State v. Zucal
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-06-24· cited 5×
• State v. Zucal
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-02-24