Court of Appeals of Oregon· 11/21/2012
State v. Zolotoff
Citations
- 253 Or. App. 593
- 291 P.3d 781
- 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1347
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury as to the crime of attempt and explaining that “[t]here is no incongruity between intentionally taking a substantial step toward possession of a weapon, see ORS 161.405(1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nakamoto, Schuman, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-05-05· cited 22×
- State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court· 1980-02-06· cited 21×
- State v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-27· cited 17×
- State v. MosesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-02-09· cited 13×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-13· cited 13×
- State v. LeckenbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-07-27· cited 11×
- State v. BatyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-05-25· cited 8×
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-07-12· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.