State v. Zito

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “per se” criminal violation to operate motor vehicle with .10 percent or greater blood alcohol content; no showing of erratic or impaired driving required
• “[T]he better law enforcement practice would be to attempt to prevent an intoxicated person from driving”.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pendleton
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1993-03-26· cited 13×
• State v. Larson
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1987-06-04· cited 13×
• Washington v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-03-15· cited 12×
• State v. Hartman
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-01-21· cited 3×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-09-21· cited 3×
• State v. Fletcher
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-06-07· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Cortez
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
• State v. Epperson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1985-07-26· cited 102×
• State v. McCorgary
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1978-10-28· cited 50×
• State v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1973-11-03· cited 38×
• Larry C. Godfrey v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1966-03-09· cited 37×
• State v. Royal
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-05-10· cited 18×
• State v. Hayes
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1979-07-13· cited 7×