State v. Zindel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plain error because of the prosecutor’s use of the defendant’s post-arrest silence to show sanity
• comment on defendant’s exercise of right to remain silent as evidence of his sanity was plain error
• key element in State’s case was that defendant’s assertion of right to remain silent was evidence that defendant was sane at the time of the crime was committed
• comments on the defendant’s post-arrest silence
• comments on the defendant's post-arrest silence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).