State v. Ziegenhagen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding delay of 25 months violated defendant’s constitutional speedy trial rights
• noting that unavailability of a necessary witness is excusable
• attributing delay caused by a mistake in the clerk’s office to the State
• “the government as an institution is charged with the duty of assuring a defendant a speedy trial”
• “the government as an institution is charged with the duty of assuring a defendant a speedy trial”
• 25-month delay violated defendant’s constitutional speedy trial rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).