State v. Zaragoza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for resentencing where the trial court failed to permit the defendant to be heard on his objection to restitution
• remanding for resentencing where the trial court failed to permit the defendant to be heard on his objection to restitution
• when defendant unambiguously objected to the imposition of restitution, the trial court was required to provide him an opportunity to be heard
• ORS 137.106(5) entitles the defendant to a hearing if the defendant objects to the imposition of restitution
• at the time of sentencing, defense counsel requested to be heard on restitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Noble
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-30· cited 9×
• State v. Umphery
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-02-23· cited 2×
• State v. Nosbisch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-12· cited 1×
• State v. Carlton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-10-14· cited 1×
• State v. Romero
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-06-18
• State v. Coronado
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-30

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Hval
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-09· cited 32×