Skip to main content
· 12/13/1968

State v. Zappia

Citations

  • 448 P.2d 119
  • 8 Ariz. App. 549
  • 1968 Ariz. App. LEXIS 587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding sufficient evidence was presented to sustain theft conviction against defendant who claimed he was in process of returning a stolen watch when the owner attacked him to reclaim it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Molloy, Hathaway, Krucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.