State v. Yule

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the interest in probation officer safety outweighed any additional intrusion into probationer’s privacy and was adequate justification for the detention of probationer’s roommate
• ap- plying Knights and concluding the warrantless search of a probationer’s home didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment where he had a non-probationer co-oc- cupant
• “A holding consists of those propositions along the chosen decisional path or paths of reasoning that (1) are actually decided, (2) are based upon the facts of the case, and (3
• “A holding consists of those propositions along the chosen decisional path or paths of reasoning that (1) are actually decided, (2) are based upon the facts of the case, and (3) lead to the judgment. If not a holding, a proposition stated in a case counts as dicta.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).