Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/8/2025
State v. Youngblood
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2794
Syllabus
The record does not affirmatively demonstrate that the trial court failed to consider the youth-mitigation factors in R.C. 2929.19(B)(1)(b) when sentencing appellant, who was 17 years old when he committed the offense. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-03· cited 113×
- State v. HuffmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-02· cited 44×
- State v. GoldblumOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-14· cited 31×
- State v. TrentOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-15· cited 18×
- State v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-29· cited 14×
- State v. BushOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-11· cited 10×
- State v. SpearsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-23· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.