Court of Appeals of Washington· 3/1/2016
State v. Young
Citations
- 192 Wash. App. 850
- 369 P.3d 205
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- witness with personal knowledge authenticated sender’s phone number and testified the messages came from defendant, making the texts admissible under ER 901(b)(1)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bjorgen, Lee, Maxa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Washington v. Daniel BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-09-01· cited 25×
- State Of Washington v. Eugene Andrew Young & Claude HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2017-05-02· cited 1×
- State Of Washington v. Jennifer Cathryn DreewesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2018-01-29
- State Of Washington, V Albert K. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2019-01-23
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court· 2016-08-03
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re the Detention of H.N.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-07-06· cited 92×
- State v. Guzman NuñezWashington Supreme Court· 2012-06-07· cited 87×
- State v. BashawWashington Supreme Court· 2010-07-01· cited 81×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-01-02· cited 68×
- Rice v. Offshore Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-01-17· cited 47×
- State of Washington v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-05-28· cited 40×
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-05-28· cited 38×
- State v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-08-12· cited 36×
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-01-08· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.