Skip to main content

State v. Young

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 1044

Syllabus

The indictment charging appellant with aggravated robbery was sufficient to put him on notice that he could be convicted of complicity to commit aggravated robbery. Appellant's conviction was based upon sufficient evidence. The indictment did not need to inform appellant that, if convicted, a prison term was mandatory. Appellant's sentence is within the statutory range, and the record reflects the trial court's consideration of R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 2929.12. Thus, the sentence is not contrary to law. Finally, appellant's proportionality argument is without merit. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.