State v. Young
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 1044
Syllabus
The indictment charging appellant with aggravated robbery was sufficient to put him on notice that he could be convicted of complicity to commit aggravated robbery. Appellant's conviction was based upon sufficient evidence. The indictment did not need to inform appellant that, if convicted, a prison term was mandatory. Appellant's sentence is within the statutory range, and the record reflects the trial court's consideration of R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 2929.12. Thus, the sentence is not contrary to law. Finally, appellant's proportionality argument is without merit. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2001-09-26· cited 585×
- State v. KeenanOhio Supreme Court· 1998-02-25· cited 329×
- State v. HerringOhio Supreme Court· 2002-02-27· cited 321×
- State v. HandOhio Supreme Court· 2006-01-18· cited 252×
- State v. Sergent (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-27· cited 162×
- State v. BuehnerOhio Supreme Court· 2006-09-27· cited 93×
- State v. PawlakOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-22· cited 75×
- John Boston Hill v. E.P. PeriniSixth Circuit· 1986-04-21· cited 49×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-14· cited 37×
- State v. GonzalezOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-19· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.