Skip to main content

State v. Young

Citations

  • 810 S.W.2d 221
  • 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 120
  • 1991 WL 94040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[t]he mere label attached either to the defendant’s motion or to the trial court’s order ruling on same cannot determine its appealability”
  • recognizing that “[t]he mere label attached either to the defendant’s motion or to the trial court’s order ruling on same cannot determine its appealability”
  • recognizing that “[t]he mere label attached either to the defendant’s motion or to the trial court’s order ruling on same cannot determine its appealability”
  • recognizing that “[t]he mere label attached either to the defendant’s motion or to the trial court’s order ruling on same cannot determine its appealability”
  • recognizing that “[t]he mere label attached either to the defendant’s motion or to the trial court’s order ruling on same cannot determine its appealability”
  • recognizing that “[t]he mere label attached either to the defendant’s motion or to the trial court’s order ruling on same cannot determine its appealability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.