Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 11/12/1992

State v. Young

Citations

866 S.W.2d 194
1992 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 863

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding no prejudice where five jurors admitting to hearing of bomb threats against jury or having noticed unusual activity
holding no prejudice where five jurors admitting to hearing of bomb threats against jury or having noticed unusual activity
affirming trial court’s denial of new trial where jurors learned of bomb threats made during trial, recognizing that “the trial judge was in the best position to assess the nature of the extraneous information, as well as its effect, if any, upon the jury”
trial judge was best able to assess the nature of extraneous information, as well as its effect, if any, upon the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Scott, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.