State v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in a DWI proceeding, the production of ampules from the same batch used in defendant’s breathalyzer test is not required as a matter of routine discovery when “there is no reasonable basis to believe that production ... will assist in defendant’s defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Morton
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-07-30· cited 222×
• State v. Stanton
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2003-04-17· cited 37×
• State v. Green
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-01-19· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• California v. Trombetta
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
• Romano v. Kimmelman
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-04-19· cited 121×
• State v. Maure
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-04-17· cited 16×
• State v. Ford
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-04-05· cited 16×
• State v. Witter
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1954-11-03· cited 11×
• State v. Tull
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-01-10· cited 5×
• State v. Teare
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-02-06· cited 4×