Skip to main content

State v. Young

Citations

  • 764 So. 2d 998
  • 2000 WL 340894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • $370.00 in cash “[was] not so large that no other inference was possible. Accordingly, a rational trier of fact could not have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that the State proved the ‘intent to distribute’ element of the crime.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shortess, C.J., Parro and Kuhn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.