State v. Yeoman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an action under the forfeiture statute followed by a criminal conviction does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of Hoisington v. $2,044 in U.S. Currency
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-07-28· cited 7×
• State I-135/I-70 Drug Task Force v. 1990 Lincoln Town Car
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-11-09· cited 5×
• State ex rel. Kansas Highway Patrol v. $381,620 in U.S. Currency
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2025-05-02

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Ursery
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
• State v. Gulledge
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-06-02· cited 29×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1996-12-27· cited 6×