State v. Yatau Her

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting a motion to dismiss on statute of limitations grounds is appropriate if it is apparent from the face of the complaint that the claim is time-barred
• remanding to the district court for the factual development of the question of “inquiry notice” necessary to the resolution of the statute of limitations question in securities fraud action
• citation and internal quotation marks USCA11 Case: 22-13410 Document: 251-1 Date Filed: 11/26/2025 Page: 16 of 36 16 Opinion of the Court 22-13410 omitted
• “[The] presumption and analysis, however, are unwarranted when Congress states its unambiguous intention that the statute apply retroactively to pre-enactment conduct . . . .”
• “[i]nquiry notice is triggered by evidence of the possibility of fraud,” not “[f]ull exposition of the scam” itself (internal quo- tation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).