State v. WZK

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that knowledge by the employer of a protected activity “is necessary to establish causation, but it is not sufficient” to prove a claim because “[p]ost hoc ergo propter hoc is not enough to support a finding of retaliation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).