Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/25/2017
State v. Wyatt
Citations
- 421 S.C. 306
- 806 S.E.2d 708
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- questioning whether less suggestive procedures were realistic alternatives, as under the circumstances \a lineup would be unworkable\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Few, Hearn, James, Kittredge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-01-17· cited 1,616×
- Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 2012-01-11· cited 846×
- State v. BaccusSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 298×
- United States v. Edwin Martinez, Jr., Also Known as Edwin Martinez Franco, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 2006-09-11· cited 78×
- State v. MansfieldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-10-02· cited 63×
- United States v. Lamar E. SandersSeventh Circuit· 2013-02-28· cited 44×
- State v. LivermanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-06-06· cited 39×
- State v. AddaiNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-02-17· cited 31×
- United States v. HawkinsSeventh Circuit· 2007-08-28· cited 27×
- Gibbs v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-05-15· cited 17×
- State v. DukesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-06-26· cited 11×
- In the Matter of Kenneth B. MasseySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-07-02· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.