Skip to main content

State v. Wright

Citations

  • 562 S.W.3d 311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that federal precedent offers strong persuasive authority for interpreting the new Missouri statute
  • recognizing that federal precedent offers strong persuasive authority for interpreting the new Missouri statute
  • finding that testimony of forensic interviewer regarding delayed disclosure by child sex-abuse victims “is ‘specialized knowledge’ that will ‘assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence’”
  • noting the legislature amended Section 490.065 in 2017 and “adopt[ed] an approach to the admissibility of expert opinions that is consistent with federal standards”
  • discussing standards for reliability of expert testimony in context of Section 490.065.2 for criminal cases
  • application for transfer denied December 18, 2018

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dowd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.