Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 4/14/2003
State v. Wright
Citations
- 579 S.E.2d 538
- 354 S.C. 48
- 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 57
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the State's explanation—that the juror had a \heavy accent\ and it was \unsure as to her command of the English language\—was a race-neutral reason
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Cureton, Stilwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Matthews v. EvattFourth Circuit· 1997-01-28· cited 234×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-04-29· cited 113×
- State v. ShulerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 104×
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-09-04· cited 72×
- Browning v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-12-11· cited 62×
- State v. HaiglerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-22· cited 48×
- Sumpter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-10· cited 26×
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-05-06· cited 22×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-17· cited 20×
- State v. Marshall & Brown-Sidorowicz, P.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1978-04-14· cited 20×
- State v. WilkesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-03-17· cited 20×
- State v. CastlemanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1951-03-23· cited 12×
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-06-25· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.