State v. Wrage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Dunkel-barger because the matter decided by the successor judge was not under submission to another judge
• “The action of one judge, sitting as the court, may have the affect of altering or setting aside a previous ruling by another judge sitting as the same court.”
• although an application for reconsideration by the defendant is proper, its rejection by a judge other than the sentencing judge is acceptable
• although an application for reconsideration by the defendant is proper, its rejection by a judge other than the sentencing judge is acceptable
• under Iowa Code § 903.2 (1979) a trial court may, on motion, reconsider a misde-meanant’s sentence although the statute only provided for reconsideration sua sponte: “We know of no rule which prohibits parties from applying to courts for appropriate relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).