State v. Worthington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a demurrer is not an appropriate way to raise an as-applied constitu- tional challenge where the defendant relies on facts extrin- sic to the charging instrument
• “If a proffered instruction is refused * * * there is no error if the instruction is not a correct statement of the law.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
• “[T]he gravamen of the offense is the failure to provide necessary and adequate medical care; the statute does not require that that conduct must lead * * * to any particular result”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Egeland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-01-29· cited 7×
• State v. Howard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-05-03· cited 6×
• State v. Cruz-Gonzelez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-30· cited 5×
• State v. Goetzinger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-09· cited 2×
• City of Portland v. Ali
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-16· cited 1×
• State v. Bracken
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-06-18· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Barnes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-09-08· cited 74×
• Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-10-05· cited 57×
• State v. Chakerian
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-06-12· cited 50×
• State v. McKenzie
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 27×
• State v. Cervantes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-12-23· cited 19×
• State v. Branch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-27· cited 17×
• State v. Reigard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-15· cited 2×