State v. Worthan
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 21
Syllabus
State's appeal. The trial court did not err in sustaining appellee's motion to suppress cell-phone data obtained pursuant to a search warrant issued by a local municipal court and served on AT&T's legal-compliance office in North Palm Beach, Florida. The trial court correctly held that the municipal court lacked authority to issue a warrant to be executed outside of its territorial jurisdiction. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ZimaOhio Supreme Court· 2004-04-28· cited 68×
- State v. OjezuaOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-22· cited 35×
- State v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-06· cited 23×
- United States v. AckiesFirst Circuit· 2019-03-13· cited 14×
- State v. JacobOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-12-30· cited 13×
- State v. Nettles (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-03-05· cited 3×
- State v. HudsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.