State v. Workman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Neither frustration nor its kinsman vindictiveness should be of weight in tipping the scales by which the elements of the court's discretion is weighed.\
• “Neither frustration nor its kinsman vindictiveness should be of weight in tipping the scales by which the elements of the court’s discretion is weighed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Polk v. Bartinicki
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-31· cited 18×
• State v. Boatwright
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-11-16· cited 16×
• State v. Policao
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-03-20· cited 12×
• State v. Lara
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-11-30· cited 4×
• State v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-11-08· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Holloway
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-07-02· cited 20×
• State v. Workman
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-11-29· cited 5×
• State Board of Medical Examiners v. Gandy
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1972-05-10· cited 1×