Utah Supreme Court· 7/22/1981
State v. Workman
Citations
- 635 P.2d 49
- 1981 Utah LEXIS 835
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- failure to exercise reasonable diligence in conducting discovery tends to negate a claim that nondisclosure was erroneous
- “[TJhe denial of motion for a mistrial does not constitute an abuse of discretion where no prejudice to the accused is shown.”
- defendant’s failure to seek a continuance tends to negate claimed element of surprise
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Stewart, Howe, Oaks, Maughan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 1,226×
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-01-10· cited 480×
- State v. HornIdaho Supreme Court· 1980-04-21· cited 65×
- People v. RosotoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-03-18· cited 35×
- State v. JarrellUtah Supreme Court· 1980-02-19· cited 28×
- State v. MilesSupreme Court of Missouri· 1963-02-11· cited 24×
- Ward v. TurnerUtah Supreme Court· 1961-10-26· cited 17×
- State v. BundyUtah Supreme Court· 1978-12-28· cited 8×
- State v. AdamsUtah Supreme Court· 1978-08-01· cited 7×
- Butt v. GrahamUtah Supreme Court· 1957-03-05· cited 6×
- Lane v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1966-07-12· cited 6×
- State v. ConradUtah Supreme Court· 1979-02-07· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.