Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/7/2019
State v. Word
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 1733
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the state's motion to amend the indictment, Word did not receive the ineffective assistance of counsel, the trial court properly instructed the jury on complicity, and the sufficiency and manifest weight of the evidence support Word's convictions.
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-14· cited 11×
- State v. HodgeOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-30· cited 5×
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-01-21· cited 3×
- State v. HawkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-24· cited 3×
- State v. HodgeOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-23· cited 1×
- State v. FarmerOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-22
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.