State v. Wool

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that needy persons have a distinct right to payment of necessary services for defense, whether or not services of an attorney are required
• holding that a defendant who qualifies as a needy person has a right to necessary services at public expense that cannot be conditioned on the defendant being represented by an appointed attorney
• holding that a defendant who qualifies as a needy person has a right to necessary services at public expense that cannot be conditioned on the defendant being represented by an appointed attorney
• holding that a defendant who qualifies as a needy person has a right to necessary services at public expense that cannot be conditioned on the defendant being represented by an appointed attorney
• explaining that preservation rule provides trial court with opportunity to address error and “facilitates the development of a record for appeal”
• defendant must demonstrate statement had capacity to influence jury and such proof must .be more than mere speculation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).