State v. Woody
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 621
Syllabus
Appellant has failed to demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Trial counsel's decision not to object to statements made by the certain witnesses was part of reasonable trial strategy, therefore appellant cannot establish that his counsel's performance was deficient. Furthermore, there is no reasonable probability the outcome of the trial would have been different but for the claimed errors.
Judges: Ringland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jeffrey D. Lundgren v. Betty Mitchell, WardenSixth Circuit· 2006-03-13· cited 562×
- State v. HesterOhio Supreme Court· 1976-02-04· cited 344×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-13· cited 291×
- State v. HollowayOhio Supreme Court· 1988-08-24· cited 283×
- State v. MundtOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-03· cited 199×
- State v. GrinsteadOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-20· cited 120×
- State v. Cepec (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-13· cited 94×
- State v. BurnsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-20· cited 46×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-09· cited 36×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-26· cited 27×
- State v. WoodOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-10· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.