State v. Woods
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1589
Syllabus
Guilty plea voluntary pro se motion to continue Crim.R. 11(C). The trial court did not err when it accepted Woods's guilty plea after it addressed the defendant personally at the plea hearing, engaged in the required colloquy with him, and fully complied with Crim.R. 11(C). The trial court did not have a duty to address a pro se motion for continuance that the defendant filed the day before pleading guilty.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court· 1987-10-07· cited 525×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 2004-02-11· cited 410×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court· 2004-10-27· cited 279×
- State v. DealOhio Supreme Court· 1969-02-11· cited 166×
- State v. MinkOhio Supreme Court· 2004-04-14· cited 81×
- State v. ReevesOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-14· cited 19×
- State v. WyleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-17· cited 19×
- Tyler v. CampbellSupreme Court· 1882-12-18· cited 18×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-07· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.