State v. Woods
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 954
Syllabus
Rape gross sexual imposition sufficiency manifest weight digital penetration sexually violent predator specification. Defendant's rape and gross sexual imposition convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and the weight of the evidence, except for one in which the evidence was not sufficient to support a rape conviction but was sufficient to support the lesser-included offense of gross sexual imposition. Trial court's guilty finding on sexually violent predator specifications were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, but the trial court erroneously found the defendant guilty on one specification that required proof of a prior conviction of sexually violent offense but there was no evidence of a prior conviction.
Judges: E.T. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2007-05-23· cited 1,198×
- State v. BelleOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-07· cited 28×
- State v. ArtisOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-27· cited 17×
- State v. Sanchez-SanchezOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-17· cited 16×
- State v. ZamoraOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-05· cited 12×
- State v. RoanOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-05· cited 11×
- State v. MackOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-04· cited 8×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-16· cited 5×
- State v. EickOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.