State v. Woods
Citations
- 105 Kan. 554
- 185 P. 21
- 1919 Kan. LEXIS 128
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Criminal Law — Burglary—Failure to Instruct upon Circumstantial Evidence — No Request — Waiver by Defendant. In a criminal prosecution circumstantial evidence alone was relied upon by the state for conviction. No instruction relating to circumstantial evidence was given, and the defendant made no request for instructions of any kind. Held, that, while an instruction upon circumstantial evidence should have been given, it was not indispensable in the sense that it might not be waived by the defendant, and that the failure to make such request waived the error in failing to instruct. {The State v. Winters, 81 Kan. 414, 105 Pad 516.)</p> <p>2. Same — Alibi—No Request for Instruction — Waiver. The general rule applied also to the failure to give an instruction upon the defense of an alibi.</p>
Judges: Porter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BerrySupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-07-22· cited 53×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1920-03-10· cited 19×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1933-04-08· cited 14×
- Skaer v. American National BankSupreme Court of Kansas· 1928-07-07· cited 13×
- State v. BooneSupreme Court of Kansas· 1927-07-09· cited 12×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas· 1925-07-11· cited 9×
- State v. McKimsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1925-11-07· cited 6×
- State v. RedmonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1929-10-05· cited 1×
- State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1927-03-12
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.