State v. Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In Arizona, being an accomplice is not a separately chargeable offense; it is merely a theory that the state may utilize to establish the commission of a substantive criminal offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Chabolla-Hinojosa
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-09-03· cited 77×
• State v. Welch
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-11-17· cited 27×
• State v. Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-04-06· cited 21×
• In Re Victoria K.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-11-07· cited 20×
• State v. Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-09-30· cited 16×
• State of Arizona v. Francisco Xavier Veloz
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-01-29· cited 9×
• In re Jessie T.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-06-08· cited 3×
• State v. Mason
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-08-30· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Celaya
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-17· cited 138×
• State v. Dugan
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-10· cited 58×
• State v. Politte
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-12-30· cited 38×
• In Re the Appeal in Marcopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-07-03· cited 32×
• State v. Bay
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-07-08· cited 29×
• State v. Gooch
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-03-01· cited 28×
• State v. Caudillo
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-11-27· cited 23×
• State v. Tellez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-04-05· cited 17×
• State v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-09-14· cited 15×
• State v. Patton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-04-07· cited 8×