State v. Woods
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2295
Syllabus
Jail Uniform; Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. Although the best practice is to place on the record an explanation for why a defendant is appearing in the jail uniform for trial, the failure to do so is not reversible error. Counsel was not ineffective for allowing the defendant to wear the jail uniform because a review of the evidence shows that the overwhelming weight of the evidence supported conviction. As a result, the outcome of the trial was unlikely to be different if the defendant was wearing street clothes rather than the jail uniform.
Judges: Willamowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,956×
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1976-06-21· cited 2,305×
- Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 1,122×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 325×
- State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-24· cited 291×
- State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-20· cited 73×
- State v. FurrOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-08· cited 17×
- State v. WadeOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-28· cited 9×
- State v. KylesOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-21· cited 7×
- State v. MaddingOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-05· cited 6×
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-01· cited 6×
- State v. ArthursOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-20· cited 4×
- State v. LetnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-02· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.