Skip to main content
· 4/17/1998

State v. Woodling

Citations

  • 957 P.2d 398
  • 264 Kan. 684
  • 1998 Kan. LEXIS 90

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an order allowing withdrawal of a plea and dismissing the case was not an order arresting judgment
  • whether a plea agreement was ambiguous is dependent on unique facts, requires a review of the trial court’s factual findings, and is of limited precedential value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.