State v. Woodard
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 251
Syllabus
Presentence motion to withdraw guilty plea, Crim.R. 32.1, right to counsel, waiver. The absence of a thorough colloquy concerning the defendant's waiver of trial counsel and request for appointment of new trial counsel establishes that the defendant did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to counsel and that the defendant was denied his constitutional right to counsel. Therefore, his convictions are vacated, and the case is remanded for the trial court to hold (1) a hearing to advise the defendant of the perils of self-representation and determine whether the defendant should be appointed new counsel, and (2) a hearing on the defendant's presentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,645×
- State v. GibsonOhio Supreme Court· 1976-03-31· cited 427×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-13· cited 291×
- State v. Beasley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-04· cited 133×
- State v. TymcioOhio Supreme Court· 1975-04-02· cited 63×
- State v. BuchananOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-13· cited 20×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-03· cited 18×
- State v. WalcotOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-19· cited 10×
- State v. BurrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-19· cited 8×
- State v. SimmonsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-10· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.