Skip to main content

State v. Wolford

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 888

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in imposing the maximum sentence for appellant's attempted felonious assault conviction. Any error of the trial court in applying R.C. 2929.12(B)(8), which concerns gender prejudice motive, was harmless error. The trial court found the presence of other factors indicating appellant's conduct was more serious than conduct normally constituting the offense, and it also found he is likely to commit crimes in the future. Appellant does not challenge these additional findings that support the imposed sentence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Luper Schuster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.