State v. Wolfe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was sufficient evidence of penetration to sustain conviction for first-degree rape even though testimony of the victim was equivocal and fraught with inconsistencies
• in a prosecution for rape, the victim’s “equivocal” and inconsistent testimony did not entitle the defendant to a judgment of acquittal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mustain
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-01-11· cited 11×
• State v. Clark
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-09-13· cited 5×
• State v. Valdez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-21· cited 3×