State v. Wiseman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pre-McNeely, holding Minnesota’s implied consent statute was not based on consent but on probable cause and exigent circumstances
• “Procedural due process requires notice and an opportunity to be heard” whereas “substantive due process protects individuals from certain arbitrary, wrongful government actions regardless of the fairness of the procedures used to implement them.” (quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ryce
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2016-02-26· cited 172×
• State v. Bernard
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-03-17· cited 11×
• State of Minnesota, (A15-0984), (A15-0998) v. Chao Moua, (A15-0984), (A15-0998).
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-01-25· cited 2×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2013-06-17
• Commonwealth v. Hyatt
  Hanover County Circuit Court· 2014-02-11

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• County of Sacramento v. Lewis
  Supreme Court· 1998-05-26· cited 6,212×
• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
• Zinermon v. Burch
  Supreme Court· 1990-02-27· cited 3,290×
• Washington v. Glucksberg
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 2,664×
• South Dakota v. Neville
  Supreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 1,275×
• Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-21· cited 884×
• Doe v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-22· cited 420×
• State v. Lothenbach
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-08-29· cited 192×
• State v. George
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-01-16· cited 107×
• McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-06-07· cited 103×
• Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-12-02· cited 96×
• In Re Linehan
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-05-27· cited 90×
• State v. Shriner
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-05-30· cited 85×
• Miller Brewing Co. v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-06-15· cited 81×
• State v. Dezso
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-03-11· cited 67×
• State v. Behl
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-05-29· cited 66×
• Mumm v. Mornson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 61×
• Essling v. Markman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-06-24· cited 58×
• State v. Netland
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-02-12· cited 57×