Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/15/1997
State v. Wise
Citations
- 946 P.2d 363
- 150 Or. App. 449
- 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1465
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- testimony regarding firearms’ serviceability for hunting was sufficient to deny defendant’s motion for acquittal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riggs, Landau, Richardson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-03-03· cited 33×
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-02-09· cited 12×
- State v. ONISHCHENKOCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-04-25· cited 9×
- Pruett v. Erickson Air-Crane Co.D. Oregon· 1998-10-07· cited 8×
- State v. IslamCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-11· cited 3×
- State v. SumpterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-22· cited 2×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 131×
- Hall v. WorkOregon Supreme Court· 1960-08-10· cited 45×
- State v. GortmakerOregon Supreme Court· 1983-08-16· cited 31×
- State v. GortmakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-12-15· cited 18×
- State v. TurechekCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-07-03· cited 12×
- State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-10-06· cited 8×
- State v. CheneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-08-24· cited 6×
- Lanz v. Douglas Tool & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-11-29· cited 5×
- State v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-05-14· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.