State v. Wisdom

Citations

• 99 Kan. 802
• 162 P. 1174

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Robbery — Information—Need Not Correspond to Complaint. No rule of law requires an information for robbery, which is framed according to the facts developed at the preliminary examination, to correspond to the complaint which served as the basis for the warrant on which the accused was arrested.</p> <p>2. Same — Plea in Abatement — Filed Too Late. A plea in abatement, founded on want of a preliminary examination, comes too late when deferred until after a verdict of guilty has been returned.</p> <p>8. Same — Evidence. The evidence examined and held to be sufficient to sustain the verdict.</p> <p>4. Same — Insufficient Motion for Arrest of Judgment. No error is committed in overruling a motion in arrest of judgment which is not based on either of the grounds specified in section 277 of the criminal code.</p>