State v. Wirth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although negligent delay does weigh against the state, in the absence of intentional misconduct it does not weigh heavily
• nine months is enough to trigger an inquiry into the other factors
• nine-month delay sufficient to trigger further inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Green
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-04-17· cited 23×
• State v. Hadsell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-07-20· cited 17×
• State v. Garcia-Plascencia
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-06-11· cited 7×
• State v. Gehrke-Young
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-05-10· cited 5×
• State v. Dunn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-22· cited 3×
• State v. Loynes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-05-20· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ivory
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 78×
• State v. Mende
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-08-24· cited 55×
• State v. Daniel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-11· cited 8×
• State v. Hacker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-04-27· cited 8×