State v. Winslow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he necessary specificity, however, need not be contained in the statute itself, but rather, the statute in question may be read in the context of related statutes, prior decisions, or generally accepted usage.”
• “[T]he necessary specificity, however, need not be contained in the statute itself, but rather, the statute in question may be read in the context of related statutes, prior decisions, or generally accepted usage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Porelle
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-04-28· cited 19×
• Asselin v. Town of Conway
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-07-02· cited 15×
• In re Justin D.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-12-13· cited 10×
• Reiner's Case
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-05-06· cited 6×
• Hall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-06-23· cited 4×
• State v. Fitanides
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-03-01· cited 4×
• State v. White
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-12-07· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Appeal of Plantier
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-05-23· cited 46×
• State v. Santana
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-01-28· cited 42×
• State v. Smagula
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-08-29· cited 30×
• State v. Bauer
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1983-08-17· cited 23×
• State v. Saucier
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-07-17· cited 22×
• In Re Doe
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-08-31· cited 18×
• State v. Dow
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-03-01· cited 11×