State v. Winquist

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “medical technologist” as used in statute dependent upon training as microbiologist and experience in withdrawal of blood and not technical requirement of certification by American Society of Clinical Pathologists
• “medical technologist” as used in statute dependent upon training as microbiologist and experience in withdrawal of blood and not technical requirement of certification by American Society of Clinical Pathologists
• \medical technologist\ as used in statute dependent upon training as microbiologist and experience in withdrawal of blood and not technical requirement of certification by American Society of Clinical Pathologists
• Qualification of person withdrawing blood for testing could not first be challenged on motion for new trial; objection ordinarily must first be made at the earliest opportunity after its ground became apparent.
• interpreting an Iowa statute similar to K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 8-1001[c]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).