State v. Winnett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “Angelos ... teaches ... courts [to] defer to an agency to make its own jurisdictional determination in the first instance, if the question on which jurisdiction turns is ‘reasonably debatable’ ”
• \[T]he Agreement [does not] violate the agency's enabling legislation by purporting to arrogate to the MdTA power that it does not have.\ (citation omitted)
• “[B]y virtue of its plenary authority over its own budget, [the MdTA] occupies the same position as the Governor and General Assembly____”
• “[T]he Agreement [does not] violate the agency’s enabling legislation by purporting to arrogate to the MdTA power that it does not have.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).