Oregon Supreme Court· 6/29/2017
State v. Winn
Citations
- 361 Or. 636
- 396 P.3d 926
- 2017 WL 2808086
- 2017 Ore. LEXIS 422
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- initial inquiry is whether, in light of the surrounding circumstances, the defendant unambiguously manifested consent or denial of consent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Balmer, Kistler, Walters, Landau, Brewer, Nakamoto, Flynn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Arroyo-SoteloCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-11-16· cited 28×
- State v. BlairOregon Supreme Court· 2017-06-15· cited 23×
- State v. HelowCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-12-06· cited 10×
- State v. DelongCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-09· cited 5×
- State v. WinnMarion County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-25· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.